Quick Glance
Nepal’s political landscape is facing renewed tension as the commission investigating the Gen Z protest crackdown prepares to summon former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and current Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak.
The inquiry panel, which is nearing its deadline, has been criticized for its slow progress — particularly for failing to question top leaders despite 76–77 reported deaths during the protests. Families of victims continue to demand accountability, while police officials defend their actions, claiming they acted within legal boundaries.
The protests, largely driven by Nepal’s younger generation, have become a symbol of frustration over governance, accountability, and state response to civil unrest. The upcoming summons could mark a turning point in the investigation and may shape Nepal’s political discourse in the months ahead.
Read More..
Nepal is once again in the global spotlight as the commission investigating the deadly Gen Z protest crackdown signals that it will soon summon former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak.
The panel, established to uncover the truth behind the protests that resulted in 76–77 deaths, has been under pressure for weeks. With its deadline approaching, critics argue that the commission has been slow and hesitant to question the country’s most powerful political figures.
Families of those killed continue to demand justice, urging the government to ensure transparency and accountability. Many accuse authorities of excessive force, while police officials maintain that their actions were lawful and necessary to maintain order.
The Gen Z protests — driven by young Nepalis frustrated with political stagnation, corruption, and lack of accountability — have become a defining moment for the nation. The potential questioning of top leaders could reshape the political narrative and determine whether the investigation is seen as credible or merely symbolic.
As Nepal watches closely, the coming days will reveal whether the commission can deliver meaningful answers or whether public distrust will deepen further.
